What the Records Do Not Tell Us

No surviving historical record documents what Sarah (Saartjie) Baartman ate during her years of exhibition in Britain and France. Court depositions from London in 1810 contain only a single, generic assurance that she was “duly supplied with good eat and drink,” without naming foods, meals, sources, quantities, or preparation.

This absence is not accidental. While Baartman’s body was repeatedly measured, described, illustrated, and preserved, the most basic elements of her daily life—how she was fed, what she preferred, whether she ate alone or with others—were never considered worthy of record.

The silence surrounding her nourishment reveals the logic of her treatment. She was documented as an object of display and study, not as a living person whose ordinary human needs merited attention. What survives is not evidence of care, but evidence of erasure.

The story of Sara Saartjie Baartman large butt, black female sexuality and body shape is still debated as empowerment vs exploitation entertainment.

Sarah Baartman was exhibited in human zoo's naked or scantily dressed throughout Britain, Paris, Ireland, and Belgium from 1810 to 1815 in cages alongside animals, in public places and rich clients’ private homes. She was pinched, poked made fun of, studied, sexualized, and ridiculed as part of exotic exhibitions in Europe.

The Hottentot Venus, Sarah Baartman was a South African Khoisan tribe woman from the Kalahari famous for the biggest butt the world has ever seen. Sarah Baartman became world famous as the most exotic of the four Hottentot Venuses paraded around Eroupe as well as a landmark court case.

Life, death and torture of African Hottentot Venus Sarah Baartman.

Treated inhumanly, the short life of the Hottentot Venus Sarah Baartman was one to be displayed and exhibited naked or scantily dressed at 225 Piccadilly in a cage on stage in London's Piccadilly Circus.

Unable to read or write, allegedly she signed a contract that she would receive half the profit. Other terms of her contract were that she would travel with Hendrik Cezar and Dunlop to England and Ireland to work as a domestic servant, and be exhibited for entertainment purposes could return to South Africa after five years.

She was put on display in 1810 at carnivals of human curiosities, live specimens and exotic exhibitions, Piccadilly Circus and freak shows in London and Paris, with crowds invited to look at her large booty and genitals. Britain's well to do society members gawked at, prodded and squeezed Sarahs so-called freakish human form which was paraded before them.

Sarah had a condition called Steatopygia that is a condition that produces a substantial amount of fat tissue on the buttocks and thighs. Steatopygia is common in the women of the Griqua Khoikhoi tribe which Sarah was born.

Britain's well to do society members gawked at, prodded and squeezed Sarah behind while attending human zoo's.

Sarah's promoters nicknamed her the Hottentot Venus. Hottentot now seen as derogatory was used by white Europeans to describe the Khoi African peoples. Sarahs physical and economic exploitation became the rallying cry of abolitionists in London. The African Association also known as African Association for promoting the discovery of the interior of Africa was founded in 1788 and brought Baartmans case to court.

Baartman was the only Hottentot Venus whose case of exploration made its way through the courts. The law case was brought before the British Judiciary System in November 1810 were observers of the court case documented what they observed Baartman to go through day-to-day. Through this court case, today this is how the world able to trace her story in London and Paris.

Activists were appalled at Sarah's treatment and how the African women were portrayed as wild sexual creatures made shamed for having large bodies. Her employers were prosecuted for holding Sarah against her will, but not convicted, with Sarah herself testifying in their favor.

Sarahs show gradually lost its novelty and popularity among audiences in Paris and she went on tour around Britain and Ireland. A year before her death in 1814, Sarah worked for Reaux, an animal exhibitor in South Africa where she was exhibited in a cage alongside animals.

Born in South Africa's Eastern Cape in 1789, Sarah Baartman died on December 29, 1815, at the age of 26, but her exhibition continued. Baron Georges Cuvier was a French zoologist who established the sciences of comparative anatomy and paleontology. He and other medical scientists codified racial difference by studying, recording and drawing Sarah Baartmans’ genitals and buttocks.

Cuvier, a naturalist obtained Baartmans' remains from local police and dissected her body. He made a plaster cast of her body, pickled her brain and genitals and placed them into jars that were placed on display at the Musee de l'Homme Museum of Man until 1974.

In 1994, President Nelson Mandela requested that the French government return the remains of Sarah. The process took eight years but on March 6, 2002, Sarah was brought back home to South Africa. 

She was buried August 9, 2002, on Women’s Day at Hankey in the Eastern Cape Province. In Sarah's honor, South Africa's Eastern Cape Province Cacadu District was renamed the Sarah Baartman District in 2015.

Did you know? Born in 1789 and died in 1815, no photographs of Sarah Baartman, the Hottentot Venus exists, only drawings. Sarah may have died from the result of health problems due to suppossed alcoholism however her cause of death cannot be confirmed. No written recording of Sarah Baartman have been found., her voice and her own life story in her words were never written down.

The human trafficking and black exploitation story of Sara Saartjie Baartman life and death story continued the belief that black women are extraterrestrial sexual black nymphos because of large butts, the nature of black female sexuality and black female bodies today is still one of empowerment vs exploitation entertainment.

Did you know? In Paris on November 19, 1814 Sarah Baartman’s large backside inspired a one act Vaudeville play called the Hottentot Venus or the hatred of the Frenchwoman written by Thiaulon,Dartois, and Brasier where a bride-to-be wears a large wide triangular dress mimicking the wide hips of Baartman to keep the attention of her husbands-to-be wandering eyes.

The Missing Meal: Sara Saartjie Baartman's Untold Food Story

We know every cruel detail of how Sara Saartjie Baartman's body was displayed across Europe. We know the measurements, the stares, the objectification. Yet, for all this obsessive recording, history is silent on the most basic human detail: what did she eat?

What stews from her homeland in South Africa did she crave while in cold London and Paris? What grains—sorghum or maize—had fueled her strength? What wild greens or roasted meats were the tastes of her childhood, the very foods that built the body Europeans found so "fascinating"?

This is the great, unsettling absence. They documented her form but erased her sustenance. They were fascinated by the iron in her display cage, but showed no curiosity about the iron-rich foods that were part of her life. In reducing her to a spectacle, they stripped away the daily human reality of hunger, meals, memory, and the simple act of nourishment. Her story is a stark reminder that to truly see a person, you must ask not just what they looked like, but what fed them.

A Note on Dignity and Return

The story of Sara Saartjie Baartman represents one of the most painful chapters in the history of how people have been treated by institutions of science and display. For decades, her remains were held far from home, studied not as a person but as a specimen.

Today, this history is understood as a profound failure of respect and ethics. After years of advocacy by the South African government and the Khoisan community, her remains were finally returned to her homeland in 2002 and laid to rest with dignity. This act of repatriation was a crucial step toward healing.

Her legacy now informs vital, ongoing efforts in museums worldwide to ensure that human dignity, community voice, and ethical care guide the stewardship of collections. It is a reminder that behind every object—and every person once treated as one—is a full human story deserving of honor.

Top 20 Largest Countries in Africa: How Vast Landscapes Shape Food Cultures

Africa — often called the Cradle of Civilization — is the world’s second-largest continent by land area and population. This 2025 update ranks the Top 20 largest African countries by land size and explores how geography determines farming, traditional crops, and culinary traditions across the continent. From the wheat fields of Algeria to the cassava farms of the Congo, size matters in Africa's food story.

Africa’s vast landmass spans farming regions from desert oases to rainforest gardens.

Africa’s Largest Countries: Where Space Meets Food Production

African country (largest → smaller)	Area (sq mi)	Area (sq km)	Food & Farming Notes
Algeria	919,595	2,381,740	Wheat Belt Date Oases
Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)	905,568	2,345,410	Cassava Heartland Rainforest Foods
Sudan	718,723	1,861,484	Sorghum Plains Nile Irrigation
Libya	679,362	1,759,540	Coastal Farming Desert Agriculture
Chad	495,755	1,284,000	Millet Fields Lake Chad Fish
Niger	489,191	1,267,000	Drought-Resistant Crops Traditional Grains
Angola	481,354	1,246,700	Coffee Highlands Cassava Farms
Mali	478,767	1,240,000	Ancient Grains Niger River Crops
South Africa	471,011	1,219,912	Wine Regions Maize Belt
Ethiopia	435,186	1,127,127	Coffee Birthplace Teff Farming
Mauritania	397,955	1,030,700	Coastal Fisheries Nomadic Herding
Egypt	386,662	1,001,450	Nile Valley Crops Ancient Bread Culture
Tanzania	364,900	945,087	Spice Islands Banana Plantations
Nigeria	356,669	923,768	Yam Capital Palm Oil Producer
Namibia	318,696	825,418	Game Meat Arid Farming
Kenya	224,962	582,650	Tea Highlands Vegetable Farms
Ghana	92,456	239,460	Cocoa Leader Plantain Dishes
Madagascar	226,657	587,040	Vanilla Islands Rice Terraces
Senegal	75,749	196,190	Peanut Basin Coastal Cuisine
Cameroon	183,568	475,440	Food Basket Diverse Crops
Morocco	172,414	446,550	Olive Groves Spice Markets

How Land Area Influences African Food Systems

Africa's largest countries aren't just big on the map—their vast territories create unique food environments:

• Space for Diversity: Countries like DRC and Sudan have room for multiple farming zones, from river valleys to highlands.
• Traditional Farming: Vast areas in Mali and Niger preserve ancient grain varieties and herding traditions.
• Transport Challenges: Getting food from remote farms to markets is a major issue in large countries like Angola and Chad.
• Climate Zones: Algeria's size spans Mediterranean coastlines to Saharan oases, creating diverse food baskets.
• Food Security: Large land area doesn't always mean food abundance—distribution and water access matter more.

Agricultural Patterns in Africa's Largest Nations

River-Based Farming: The Nile (Egypt, Sudan), Niger (Mali, Niger), and Congo rivers support intensive agriculture in otherwise dry regions.

Rainforest Harvest: DRC's vast forests provide wild foods, medicinal plants, and shifting cultivation areas.

Savanna Grains: The Sahel belt across Chad, Niger, and Mali is the heartland of millet and sorghum farming.

Coastal Fisheries: Mauritania, Namibia, and South Africa's long coastlines support major fishing industries.

Highland Crops: Ethiopia and Kenya's elevation allows coffee, tea, and temperate vegetable farming.

Frequently Asked Questions About Africa's Land and Food

Does larger land area mean more food production in Africa?

Not necessarily. While large countries like DRC and Sudan have agricultural potential, factors like water access, soil quality, and infrastructure matter more than sheer size. Algeria is Africa's largest country but imports much of its food due to desert conditions.

Which large African country is most self-sufficient in food?

Ethiopia has made significant progress with its diverse climate zones allowing multiple harvests. South Africa is also a major food producer and exporter within the continent.

How does land size affect traditional cooking in Africa?

Vast countries develop regional cuisines: coastal dishes in Libya's Mediterranean north versus Saharan nomadic foods in the south. Nigeria's size creates distinct yam-based dishes in the east, millet in the north, and seafood in the south.

What traditional farming methods work best in large, dry countries?

Countries like Niger and Chad use drought-resistant millet varieties, nomadic pastoralism, and oasis gardening. Sudan utilizes flood retreat farming along the Nile.

Which large African countries are leading in organic farming?

Tanzania and Ethiopia have growing organic sectors, particularly for coffee and spices. Uganda (though not in top 20 by size) is a leader in organic agriculture.

Final Thought: Africa's largest countries tell a story of agricultural adaptation—from the irrigated fields along ancient rivers to the shifting cultivation of vast rainforests. Their food traditions are as diverse as their landscapes, proving that in Africa, land size shapes what's on the plate.

The African Gourmet Foodways Archive

Entry: The Weight of Firewood — Time, Trauma, and the Hearth

Before sunrise. The search begins. Miles walked for a few branches.

This entry documents the invisible labor in every meal across much of Africa: the collection of firewood. It archives not just the act, but the time lost, the body burdened, the fear endured, and the health sacrificed so that food can be cooked.

Sensory Archive: The Smell of Smoke, The Weight of Wood

• Smell: Smoke that burns eyes and irritates throat; dust and sweat during collection. :contentReference[oaicite:11]{index=11}
• Sound: Footsteps and breaking branches—then silence used as vigilance where leaving camp/settlement to collect firewood increases risk of sexual violence. :contentReference[oaicite:12]{index=12}
• Touch: Splintering bark; heavy loads carried on head/back with documented risk of muscle strain, spinal injury, fractures, pregnancy complications, and chronic pain. :contentReference[oaicite:13]{index=13}
• Taste: Firewood is “more than fuel,” shaping the taste/smell of staples; women link collection directly to cooking nsima. :contentReference[oaicite:14]{index=14}
• Fear: Documented danger on routes (animal + human predators) and documented patterns of assault during firewood collection in displacement/conflict settings. :contentReference[oaicite:15]{index=15}
• Camaraderie: Group walking as safety and friendship—documented as “teenage friends” on the trek; firewood as a social practice within daily coping. :contentReference[oaicite:16]{index=16}

Sensory Testimony: Women Who Carry the Wood

Unlike institutional food systems, the sensory reality of firewood collection has been directly documented in women’s own words across multiple African regions. These testimonies appear in development studies, oral histories, and gender-based violence reports. What follows is a synthesis of those documented voices.

Smell: Smoke Before the Fire

Women consistently describe the smell of firewood labor beginning before cooking: dry dust lifted by footsteps, crushed leaves, sweat, and the sharp scent of green or resinous wood. In Ethiopia and Kenya, women collecting eucalyptus note the smoke as eye-burning and bitter. In refugee and peri-urban settings, women report smoke mixed with plastics or treated wood, producing nausea and headaches.

Touch: Weight, Grain, and Pain

Across regions, women describe the wood itself as abrasive, splintering, and unforgiving. Bark cuts the skin. The load presses into the crown of the head or the upper spine. Women speak of numb shoulders, burning muscles, and the slow reshaping of the body over years of carrying — “the back bends even when the load is gone.”

Sound: Silence as Warning

Testimony from conflict-affected areas describes a critical sensory shift: silence. Women report walking without speaking, listening for footsteps, breaking branches, or male voices. In these accounts, silence is fear. The absence of sound signals danger as much as its presence.

Taste: Dust, Thirst, and Smoke

Women frequently describe dust in the mouth, thirst during long walks, and the later taste of food cooked over the fire they gathered — smoky, sometimes acrid, sometimes comforting. The taste of the meal is inseparable from the labor that produced the flame.

Camaraderie: Walking Together

Despite danger and exhaustion, many women describe firewood collection as one of the few spaces of shared female presence. Walking in groups provides safety, conversation, song, and mutual vigilance. Friendships are formed on these paths. News is exchanged. For some, it is the only time they speak freely outside the home.

Source Basis: Synthesized from women’s testimonies documented by the World Health Organization, UN Women, Human Rights Watch, Practical Action, and regional ethnographic studies on fuelwood collection, energy poverty, and gender-based violence.

AFHA Evidentiary Note: This archive preserves women’s sensory descriptions as reported. Where language varies by region, shared sensory patterns are noted without collapsing local specificity.

Balance on rough terrain. Every meal has this physical cost.

Regional Comparison: Firewood Collection as Sensory Risk Infrastructure

Region / Setting	What Women Say / What Is Documented	Primary Sensory Markers	Archive-Grade Source
Malawi (rural, Mount Mulanje area)	Women and girls trekking for hours; “It’s heavy”; danger on routes; “crocodiles” also coded as human predators.	Load pain; fear; distance; staples tied to fuel (nsima).	Pulitzer Center field reporting (direct quotes). :contentReference[oaicite:19]{index=19}
Sudan/Darfur (conflict + displacement)	Documented pattern: women and girls attacked/raped when leaving relative protection to collect firewood and other essentials.	Silence/vigilance; fear; route-risk.	Human Rights Watch documentation. :contentReference[oaicite:20]{index=20}
Refugee camps: Kakuma (Kenya) + Goudoubo (Burkina Faso)	Firewood embedded in camp economies and coping; explicitly linked to taste/smell of cooking cultures even when labelled “dirty” fuel.	Taste/smell of staples; soot/shame; scarcity.	Chatham House ethnographic research paper section on “Firewood.” :contentReference[oaicite:21]{index=21}
Cross-regional public health (general)	Documented acute symptoms (burning eyes, cough, irritation) + musculoskeletal injury risk from fuel carrying; women/children bear greatest burden.	Eye/throat burn; breath limitation; chronic pain.	WHO fact sheet + WHO health risks page. :contentReference[oaicite:22]{index=22}
Sudan (current conflict context)	UN Women notes everyday survival acts—including collecting firewood—carry risk of sexual violence.	Fear; constraint; “ordinary” tasks as danger zones.	UN Women press briefing remarks (2025). :contentReference[oaicite:23]{index=23}

The walk home. The heaviest part—physically and mentally.

Time Poverty: The Hours That Disappear

Women and girls spend 20+ hours per week collecting firewood. That is time not spent in school, not spent resting, not spent with children, not spent building a business.

Comparison: A household with gas or electricity regains 3–4 hours each day. That is the difference between illiteracy and education, between exhaustion and energy, between vulnerability and safety.

Trauma & Health: The Body Pays

• Physical: Spinal injuries, pelvic damage, chronic respiratory disease. Cooking with firewood is equivalent to smoking 3–20 packs of cigarettes a day (WHO).
• Sexual Violence: Women searching in remote or conflict areas face rape, harassment, assault. The threat is a constant companion.
• Mental: Anxiety, hypervigilance, PTSD—the psychological tax of dangerous labor.

Urban reliance. Woodfuel is not only rural. Cities run on it too.

Environmental & Economic Reality

Over 80% of energy in African countries comes from wood. It is both an engine of survival and a source of deforestation, air pollution, and climate vulnerability.

The trade provides income for millions, but often under unsafe, exploitative conditions for women and girls.

Generational transmission. Young girls learn the labor—and the time poverty.

A lifetime of carrying. The body remembers even when the mind tries to forget.

Why Archive This?

Because food heritage is not just recipes. It is fuel, time, labor, and risk. To understand African foodways, you must understand the weight of the wood that cooks it—and the weight of the hours lost carrying it.

We preserve this so future generations know: the flavor of a meal is also the taste of the struggle to prepare it.

AFHA System Link: Fuel as Control

This record is structurally linked to AFG-UG-LUZIRA-001 — The Engineered Meal: Carceral Food Systems at Luzira Prison.

In domestic contexts, fuel scarcity manifests as time poverty and bodily risk. In carceral contexts, fuel is rationed, regulated, and weaponized as institutional control. In both systems, fire determines not only what is eaten, but who decides.

Fuel is the first ingredient in every meal. This record connects to a larger archive documenting African food as infrastructure. Explore African foodways →

---

Curated by: The African Gourmet Foodways Archive

Source: Original article on the burdens of firewood collection in Africa.

Preservation Date: 2025 | License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

The Rice Shock: Liberia’s 1979 Staple Price Collapse

Food Systems Under Constraint: Liberia’s 1979 Staple Price Collapse

AFHA Entry ID: AFHA-RICE-1979-LBR
Classification:Food Systems Under Constraint → Staple Price Shock
Status: Verified System Record (Closed)

Archival Context

In Liberia, rice is not merely food—it is the primary urban calorie and a political stabilizer.

By 1979, Liberia’s food system had become structurally dependent on imported rice. Substitution foods—cassava, plantain, millet—had been culturally and economically displaced in urban centers.

Food System Architecture (Pre-Shock)

• Staple Dependence: Rice constituted the dominant daily calorie intake.
• Import Reliance: Domestic rice production lagged behind demand.
• Urban Vulnerability: Monrovia households purchased—not grew—food.
• State Price Control: Government policy directly set rice affordability.

The Price Shock Event

In April 1979, the Liberian government approved a sharp increase in the price of a 100-pound bag of rice—from approximately $22 to as high as $30.

For households surviving on less than one U.S. dollar per day, this represented an immediate caloric crisis.

System Failure Cascade

• Immediate food inaccessibility for urban households
• Absence of affordable substitute staples
• Rapid mass mobilization driven by hunger, not ideology
• State security response to a food-triggered crowd

The result was lethal. Dozens were killed and hundreds injured within hours. AFHA records this outcome not as a riot, but as the terminal expression of a failed food system.

Like the rationed meals at Luzira Prison, Liberia’s rice crisis shows how control over staple calories becomes control over bodies when alternatives are structurally removed.

Aftermath and Structural Persistence

The price increase was reversed. Officials were removed. Yet Liberia’s underlying food architecture did not change.

Rice remained politically untouchable, imports continued, and urban dependency deepened—setting conditions for future instability.

This crisis shows how food policy shapes hunger and power. It is part of a broader archive on African food systems and survival. Explore the African Gourmet Foodways Archive →

AFHA Archival Note

AFHA does not archive protest movements. This entry is preserved as a record of how food price policy can function as a trigger for mass mortality in mono-staple economies.

---

The African Gourmet Foodways Archive

Food systems fail long before crowds move.

The rich need the poor.

Survival of the Fattest, obese Europeans starving Africa

📌 Learn about Africa’s powerful civilizations before Europeans.

Survival of the Fattest is a sculpture of a small starving African man, carrying Lady Justice, a huge obese European woman who is a symbol of the rich world.

Survival of the Fattest Meaning

The copper statue Survival of the Fattest by Jens Galschiøt and Lars Calmar was created in 2002. The fat woman is holding a pair of scales as a symbol of justice however; she is closing her eyes so the justice. Galschiot symbolized the woman as being blind, refusing to see the obvious injustice.

For the rich people of the world the main issue in life is that of overeating while people in the third world are dying every day from hunger. The misery of imbalanced wealth distribution is creating floods of refugees. However the rich only want to preserve their privileges and take measures so harsh against the poor they betray their morals and humanism.

 

Survival of the Fattest has been displayed throughout Germany, and Paris France as a visual symbol of imbalanced wealth distribution. Art In Defense of Humanism, AIDOH states "Due to the imbalanced distribution of the resources in the world, the most people in the western countries are living comfortably; they are oppressing the poor people by means of an unjust world trade."

Survival of the Fattest statue four facts.

In 2009 at the 15th Climate Change Conference, Jens Galschiot exhibited a series of sculptures titled Seven Meters, in which Survival of the Fattest was the most popular sculpture.

On the sculpture there is an inscription, which states: "I'm sitting on the back of a man. He is sinking under the burden. I would do anything to help him. Except stepping down from his back."

The 11 feet, 3.5 meters tall Survival of the Fattest sculpture was created by Jens Galschiøt in collaboration with his colleague Lars Calmar.

Survival of the Fattest sculpture was unveiled in December 2002 in Copenhagen Denmark.

📚 This story is part of the Explore Africa Collection .