🌿 Share this page

African foods are systems of knowledge

Africa told through food, memory, and time.

The Expedition's Food Voucher: How Wire Helped Feed Stanley's Search for Livingstone

The Expedition's Food Voucher: How Wire, Cloth and Beads Helped Feed Stanley's Search for Livingstone

How coils of metal turned into meals on the journey to Ujiji

The Core Idea: In 1871, Henry Morton Stanley led over 150 people into the interior of Africa to find Dr. David Livingstone. They couldn't carry all their food. Survival meant trading for it daily. While Stanley used cloth, beads, and wire, this article focuses on why brass and copper wire became a standout currency—especially for buying the food that kept the historic expedition alive.

How Wire Helped Feed Stanley's Search for Livingstone

The Daily Challenge: Feeding a Moving Village

"Stanley's caravan was like a small, moving town — over 150 people, including soldiers, guides, and hundreds of African porters (called pagazis) who carried every bale of cloth, coil of wire, and tool on their heads. Carrying months of food for everyone was impossible. The porters made the impossible possible by hauling the trade goods that bought fresh provisions day by day along the route.

"In Ujiji… wire is reckoned as gold, beads as copper coins, and cloth as silver."
— Henry Morton Stanley, How I Found Livingstone

The Expedition's "Gold": Why Wire Was Special

Stanley bought about 350 pounds of specific brass wire (called "Nos. 5 and 6") before his journey. It had clear advantages for high-value trades:

Wire's Advantages for Food Trade:

  • Agreed Value: Measured by weight in frasilahs (about 35 lbs), its value was clear to everyone, preventing arguments.
  • Lasting & Compact: It didn't rot like cloth or spill like beads. A coil stored a lot of value in a small space.
  • Local Use: African metalsmiths and artisans highly valued it for making jewelry, tools, and decoration, so demand was always strong.

From Wire to Supper: What Did It Buy?

Stanley's journals show wire was key for securing bulk provisions and special deals:

  • Staple Grains: Rice, maize, and millet for the daily porridge (posho).
  • Protein: Goats and chickens for meat.
  • Safe Passage & Market Access: Paying a chief with wire (hongo) often meant his people would then bring food to sell to the caravan.

Cloth and beads handled many everyday small trades, but wire often closed the bigger, more important food deals.

How Wire Helped Feed Stanley's Search for Livingstone

4. The Shrinking Coil: A Sign of Rising Hunger

The most telling part of the journey was watching the wire supply shrink. As coils were used up, Stanley wrote with growing worry. Less wire meant less power to bargain for food in the next village. This wasn't just about running out of a trade item—it was the real fear of running out of meals. The wire was a physical measure of their safety from hunger.

Conclusion: The Metal That Bought the Next Meal

The famous meeting at Ujiji was built on a foundation of daily meals, bargained for and paid in trade goods. Brass wire, valued as "gold" in the interior, was a star player in that system. It was durable, valuable, and perfect for high-stakes trades for goats, grain, and safe passage to markets. Understanding this simple metal coil helps us answer the practical question behind the adventure: How did they eat? The answer: with careful strategy and a good supply of wire, cloth, and beads—the original expedition food vouchers.

FAQ: The Shopping List for Finding Dr. Livingstone

Trade Goods & The Food They Bought

Wait, they used wire like money? Why not just use coins?

Exactly. European or Zanzibari coins were useless in the African interior. The economy ran on barter—trading useful goods for other goods. People wanted things they couldn't make locally. Brass and copper wire was perfect: durable, could be measured by weight, and was in high demand by artisans for jewelry and tools. It was a commodity currency—valuable in itself, not just a piece of metal with a king's face on it.

So wire was the most important thing they brought?

It was one of the "Big Three" currencies, each with a special role. Stanley himself compared them to precious metals:

Wire was "GOLD"

For high-value deals. Used to pay tribute (hongo) to chiefs and buy bulk protein like goats.

Cloth was "SILVER"

The everyday money. Specific types were key: "Merikani" (American unbleached cotton) and "Kaniki" (dark, patterned cloth) were essentials for buying daily grain rations (posho).

Beads were "COPPER COINS"

For smaller trades. Color was everything. "White-heart" beads were wanted in one village, while "red cornelian" or blue "sungomazzi" beads were the only accepted currency in another. Wrong color = no trade.

What kind of wire was it?

Not just any scrap wire. Stanley specifically bought "Nos. 5 and 6 brass wire"—about as thick as telegraph wire. This specific gauge was known and desired in interior trade networks. He bought it in coils measured by the frasilah (about 35 pounds each).

What food did this "Big Three" actually buy?

They bought the expedition's daily survival menu:

  • Staples: Posho (a thick porridge made from maize, millet, or rice).
  • Protein: Goats, chickens, and occasionally beef.
  • Extras: Bananas, vegetables, and the crucial mineral salt.
The Trade Breakdown: Cloth and beads often bought the daily porridge. The valuable wire was saved for bigger purchases—like securing a goat for the whole caravan or paying a chief for safe passage to a market.
Did they run out?

Yes. This was a constant, deep anxiety. Watching the coils of wire and bolts of cloth shrink was like watching their bank account empty. As supplies ran low, their bargaining power vanished, and the threat of real hunger set in. Managing these trade goods was a daily, life-or-death calculation.

Is this why the meeting at Ujiji is such a big deal?

It adds a crucial layer of understanding. That famous handshake wasn't just the end of an adventure; it was the successful end of an incredible logistical operation. Keeping over 150 people fed and moving for months, navigating intricate local economies where the wrong bead color could ruin a deal, was a massive challenge. Finding Livingstone proved Stanley wasn't just brave—he was a savvy, if desperate, traveling merchant who understood the real price of a meal.

The Real Cost of Exploration

The story of the "Big Three" trade goods reveals a fundamental truth of 19th-century African exploration: success depended as much on economic savvy as on geographical courage. Before any map could be drawn, a deal had to be struck. The expedition's pantry was not filled from a European store, but from local markets, paid for with coils of wire, bolts of specific cloth, and strings of precisely colored beads. The journey to Ujiji was, in many ways, one of history's most high-stakes shopping trips.

Cite The Source

Copy & Paste Citation

One click copies the full citation to your clipboard.

APA Style: Click button to generate
African woman farmer

She Feeds Africa

Before sunrise, after sunset, seven days a week — she grows the food that keeps the continent alive.

60–80 % of Africa’s calories come from her hands.
Yet the land, the credit, and the recognition still belong to someone else.

To every mother of millet and miracles —
thank you.

The African Gourmet Foodways Archive

Feeding a continent

African Gourmet FAQ

Archive Inquiries

What is The African Gourmet Foodways Archive?

We are a structured digital repository and scholarly publication dedicated to documenting, analyzing, and preserving African culinary heritage. We treat foodways—encompassing ingredients, techniques, rituals, ecology, labor, and trade—as primary sources for cultural understanding. Our 19-year collection (2006–present) is a living timeline, connecting historical research with contemporary developments to show cultural evolution in real time.

Why "Gourmet" in the name?

The term reflects our origin as a culinary anthropology project and our enduring principle: discernment. "Gourmet" here signifies a curated, sensory-driven approach to preservation. It means we choose depth over breadth, treating each entry—whether a West African stew or the political biography of a cashew nut—with the scholarly and contextual seriousness it deserves.

What is your methodological framework?

Our work is guided by a public Methodological Framework that ensures transparency and rigor. It addresses how we verify sources, adjudicate conflicting narratives, and document everything from botanical identification to oral history. This framework is our commitment to moving beyond the "list of facts" to create a reliable, layered cultural record.

How is content selected and organized?

Curration follows archival principles of significance, context, and enduring value. Each entry is tagged within our internal taxonomy (Foodway, Ingredient, Technique, Ritual, Ecology, Labor, Seasonality, etc.) and must meet our sourcing standards. We prioritize specificity—tagging by ethnolinguistic group, region, and nation—to actively prevent a pan-African flattening of narratives.

What geographic and cultural scope do you cover?

Our mission is comprehensive preservation across all 54 African nations. A core principle is elevating underrepresented cultural narratives. You will find deep studies of major cuisines alongside documentation of localized, hyper-specific practices that are often excluded from broader surveys.

How do you handle sources when archives are silent?

When written records are absent, we cite living practice as a valid source. We employ rigorous ethnographic standards: interviews are documented (with permission), practices are observed in context, and knowledge is attributed to specific practitioners and communities. This allows us to archive the intangible—sensory knowledge, oral techniques, ritual contexts—with the same care as a printed text.

Can researchers and the public access the archive?

Absolutely. We are committed to accessibility. The full 19-year collection is searchable and organized for diverse uses: academic research, curriculum development, journalistic sourcing, and personal education. We encourage citation. For in-depth research assistance, please contact us.

How does this work ensure genuine cultural preservation?

By consistently applying our framework since 2006, we have built more than a collection; we have created an irreplaceable record of context. We preserve not just a recipe, but its surrounding ecosystem of labor, seasonality, and meaning. This long-term, methodical commitment ensures future generations will understand not only *what* was eaten, but *how* and *why*, within the full complexity of its cultural moment.