🌿 Share this page

Archiving the intangible systems of African food.
African food are a system of knowledge

Africa told through food, memory, and time.

The story of Sara Saartjie Baartman large butt, black female sexuality and body shape is still debated as empowerment vs exploitation entertainment.

Sarah Baartman was exhibited in human zoo's naked or scantily dressed throughout Britain, Paris, Ireland, and Belgium from 1810 to 1815 in cages alongside animals, in public places and rich clients’ private homes. She was pinched, poked made fun of, studied, sexualized, and ridiculed as part of exotic exhibitions in Europe.

The Hottentot Venus, Sarah Baartman was a South African Khoisan tribe woman from the Kalahari famous for the biggest butt the world has ever seen. Sarah Baartman became world famous as the most exotic of the four Hottentot Venuses paraded around Eroupe as well as a landmark court case.

Sara Baartman

Life, death and torture of African Hottentot Venus Sarah Baartman.

Treated inhumanly, the short life of the Hottentot Venus Sarah Baartman was one to be displayed and exhibited naked or scantily dressed at 225 Piccadilly in a cage on stage in London's Piccadilly Circus.

Unable to read or write, allegedly she signed a contract that she would receive half the profit. Other terms of her contract were that she would travel with Hendrik Cezar and Dunlop to England and Ireland to work as a domestic servant, and be exhibited for entertainment purposes could return to South Africa after five years.

She was put on display in 1810 at carnivals of human curiosities, live specimens and exotic exhibitions, Piccadilly Circus and freak shows in London and Paris, with crowds invited to look at her large booty and genitals. Britain's well to do society members gawked at, prodded and squeezed Sarahs so-called freakish human form which was paraded before them.

Sarah had a condition called Steatopygia that is a condition that produces a substantial amount of fat tissue on the buttocks and thighs. Steatopygia is common in the women of the Griqua Khoikhoi tribe which Sarah was born.

Life, death and torture of big booty African hottentot venus Sarah Baartman
Britain's well to do society members gawked at, prodded and squeezed Sarah behind while attending human zoo's.

Sarah's promoters nicknamed her the Hottentot Venus. Hottentot now seen as derogatory was used by white Europeans to describe the Khoi African peoples. Sarahs physical and economic exploitation became the rallying cry of abolitionists in London. The African Association also known as African Association for promoting the discovery of the interior of Africa was founded in 1788 and brought Baartmans case to court.

Baartman was the only Hottentot Venus whose case of exploration made its way through the courts. The law case was brought before the British Judiciary System in November 1810 were observers of the court case documented what they observed Baartman to go through day-to-day. Through this court case, today this is how the world able to trace her story in London and Paris.

Activists were appalled at Sarah's treatment and how the African women were portrayed as wild sexual creatures made shamed for having large bodies. Her employers were prosecuted for holding Sarah against her will, but not convicted, with Sarah herself testifying in their favor.

Sarahs show gradually lost its novelty and popularity among audiences in Paris and she went on tour around Britain and Ireland. A year before her death in 1814, Sarah worked for Reaux, an animal exhibitor in South Africa where she was exhibited in a cage alongside animals.

Born in South Africa's Eastern Cape in 1789, Sarah Baartman died on December 29, 1815, at the age of 26, but her exhibition continued. Baron Georges Cuvier was a French zoologist who established the sciences of comparative anatomy and paleontology. He and other medical scientists codified racial difference by studying, recording and drawing Sarah Baartmans’ genitals and buttocks.

Cuvier, a naturalist obtained Baartmans' remains from local police and dissected her body. He made a plaster cast of her body, pickled her brain and genitals and placed them into jars that were placed on display at the Musee de l'Homme Museum of Man until 1974.

In 1994, President Nelson Mandela requested that the French government return the remains of Sarah. The process took eight years but on March 6, 2002, Sarah was brought back home to South Africa. 

She was buried August 9, 2002, on Women’s Day at Hankey in the Eastern Cape Province. In Sarah's honor, South Africa's Eastern Cape Province Cacadu District was renamed the Sarah Baartman District in 2015.

Did you know? Born in 1789 and died in 1815, no photographs of Sarah Baartman, the Hottentot Venus exists, only drawings. Sarah may have died from the result of health problems due to suppossed alcoholism however her cause of death cannot be confirmed. No written recording of Sarah Baartman have been found., her voice and her own life story in her words were never written down.

The human trafficking and black exploitation story of Sara Saartjie Baartman life and death story continued the belief that black women are extraterrestrial sexual black nymphos because of large butts, the nature of black female sexuality and black female bodies today is still one of empowerment vs exploitation entertainment.

Did you know? In Paris on November 19, 1814 Sarah Baartman’s large backside inspired a one act Vaudeville play called the Hottentot Venus or the hatred of the Frenchwoman written by Thiaulon,Dartois, and Brasier where a bride-to-be wears a large wide triangular dress mimicking the wide hips of Baartman to keep the attention of her husbands-to-be wandering eyes.

The Missing Meal: Sara Saartjie Baartman's Untold Food Story

We know every cruel detail of how Sara Saartjie Baartman's body was displayed across Europe. We know the measurements, the stares, the objectification. Yet, for all this obsessive recording, history is silent on the most basic human detail: what did she eat?

What stews from her homeland in South Africa did she crave while in cold London and Paris? What grains—sorghum or maize—had fueled her strength? What wild greens or roasted meats were the tastes of her childhood, the very foods that built the body Europeans found so "fascinating"?

This is the great, unsettling absence. They documented her form but erased her sustenance. They were fascinated by the iron in her display cage, but showed no curiosity about the iron-rich foods that were part of her life. In reducing her to a spectacle, they stripped away the daily human reality of hunger, meals, memory, and the simple act of nourishment. Her story is a stark reminder that to truly see a person, you must ask not just what they looked like, but what fed them.

A Note on Dignity and Return

The story of Sara Saartjie Baartman represents one of the most painful chapters in the history of how people have been treated by institutions of science and display. For decades, her remains were held far from home, studied not as a person but as a specimen.

Today, this history is understood as a profound failure of respect and ethics. After years of advocacy by the South African government and the Khoisan community, her remains were finally returned to her homeland in 2002 and laid to rest with dignity. This act of repatriation was a crucial step toward healing.

Her legacy now informs vital, ongoing efforts in museums worldwide to ensure that human dignity, community voice, and ethical care guide the stewardship of collections. It is a reminder that behind every object—and every person once treated as one—is a full human story deserving of honor.

Cite The Source

Copy & Paste Citation

One click copies the full citation to your clipboard.

APA Style: Click button to generate
African woman farmer

She Feeds Africa

Before sunrise, after sunset, seven days a week — she grows the food that keeps the continent alive.

60–80 % of Africa’s calories come from her hands.
Yet the land, the credit, and the recognition still belong to someone else.

Read her story →

To every mother of millet and miracles —
thank you.

The African Gourmet Foodways Archive

Feeding a continent

African Gourmet FAQ

Archive Inquiries

What is The African Gourmet Foodways Archive?

We are a structured digital repository and scholarly publication dedicated to documenting, analyzing, and preserving African culinary heritage. We treat foodways—encompassing ingredients, techniques, rituals, ecology, labor, and trade—as primary sources for cultural understanding. Our 19-year collection (2006–present) is a living timeline, connecting historical research with contemporary developments to show cultural evolution in real time.

Why "Gourmet" in the name?

The term reflects our origin as a culinary anthropology project and our enduring principle: discernment. "Gourmet" here signifies a curated, sensory-driven approach to preservation. It means we choose depth over breadth, treating each entry—whether a West African stew or the political biography of a cashew nut—with the scholarly and contextual seriousness it deserves.

What is your methodological framework?

Our work is guided by a public Methodological Framework that ensures transparency and rigor. It addresses how we verify sources, adjudicate conflicting narratives, and document everything from botanical identification to oral history. This framework is our commitment to moving beyond the "list of facts" to create a reliable, layered cultural record.

How is content selected and organized?

Curration follows archival principles of significance, context, and enduring value. Each entry is tagged within our internal taxonomy (Foodway, Ingredient, Technique, Ritual, Ecology, Labor, Seasonality, etc.) and must meet our sourcing standards. We prioritize specificity—tagging by ethnolinguistic group, region, and nation—to actively prevent a pan-African flattening of narratives.

What geographic and cultural scope do you cover?

Our mission is comprehensive preservation across all 54 African nations. A core principle is elevating underrepresented cultural narratives. You will find deep studies of major cuisines alongside documentation of localized, hyper-specific practices that are often excluded from broader surveys.

How do you handle sources when archives are silent?

When written records are absent, we cite living practice as a valid source. We employ rigorous ethnographic standards: interviews are documented (with permission), practices are observed in context, and knowledge is attributed to specific practitioners and communities. This allows us to archive the intangible—sensory knowledge, oral techniques, ritual contexts—with the same care as a printed text.

Can researchers and the public access the archive?

Absolutely. We are committed to accessibility. The full 19-year collection is searchable and organized for diverse uses: academic research, curriculum development, journalistic sourcing, and personal education. We encourage citation. For in-depth research assistance, please contact us.

How does this work ensure genuine cultural preservation?

By consistently applying our framework since 2006, we have built more than a collection; we have created an irreplaceable record of context. We preserve not just a recipe, but its surrounding ecosystem of labor, seasonality, and meaning. This long-term, methodical commitment ensures future generations will understand not only *what* was eaten, but *how* and *why*, within the full complexity of its cultural moment.