The Collapse of Ujamaa, Villagization, and the Structural Displacement of African Women
How Tanzania's Ujamaa Policy Disrupted Food, Farms, and Family Meals
Tanzania's Ujamaa policy failed not just as a political idea, but as a system that deeply damaged the nation's relationship with food. President Julius Nyerere's plan, known as Villagization, forcibly moved people away from their ancestral farms and kitchens. This broke the vital, generations-old connection between African women and the land that fed their families. The cost was measured in empty granaries, lost recipes, and the daily struggle to find cooking firewood and water.
 |
| Women working the family fields in colonial Africa, 1949. Their knowledge of the land and crops was built over generations. |
Ujamaa Imposed a New Food System From the Top Down
Nyerere was educated under a colonial system that saw African agriculture as backward. His Ujamaa policy, while meant to unite Tanzania, unfortunately copied this "top-down" approach to food and farming. Instead of building on the existing, successful ways communities grew maize, sorghum, and vegetables, the government decided it knew best. This ignored the deep agricultural knowledge held by families, especially women who were the primary farmers and food providers.
Uprooting the Traditional African Kitchen Garden
The core of daily food security for generations was the family plot and the kitchen garden. Women knew exactly which plot grew the best beans, where the wild leafy vegetables (like mlenda or mchicha) sprouted after rains, and which trees provided fruits and medicinal herbs. Villagization tore people away from these personalized food landscapes. Moving to a new, unfamiliar village meant starting a farm from scratch on often poorer soil, with no knowledge of where to find wild ingredients or clean water for cooking.
The Lost Knowledge of Seeds and Seasons
Nyerere believed traditional African farming was simple and classless. But this view missed its sophisticated complexity. Families had developed specific seed varieties that thrived in their local micro-climates. They understood intricate seasonal signs for planting and harvest. The forced move to communal villages disrupted this ancient agricultural calendar. Shared communal farms often failed because they lacked this localized, intimate knowledge of the land and its cycles, leading to poorer harvests and hunger.
African Socialism and the Dream of Communal Food
Ujamaa, meaning "familyhood," was Tanzania's version of African socialism. It promoted the idea of communities farming together and sharing the food equally. In theory, this was meant to ensure no one went hungry. The goal was to move away from individual family plots to large communal fields, changing the very foundation of how food was grown and distributed.
The Flaw in the Communal Farm Plan
The problem was that the heart of African food culture has always been deeply family-centered. The family farm wasn't just a plot of land; it was a source of pride, identity, and specific culinary tradition. A family might have a special way of growing their millet or a prized recipe for pumpkin leaves. Forcing people into communal farming broke this direct link between a family's labor and the food on their own table. It removed personal responsibility and often led to smaller harvests because the communal land was not cared for with the same love and knowledge as a family's own fields.
Villagization: The Daily Struggle for Firewood and Water
The villagization program forced a sudden and dramatic change in the daily routine of preparing food. Initially voluntary, it soon became forced. This wasn't just about moving homes; it was about moving entire food systems.
In their old homes, women knew the efficient paths to trusted water sources and sustainable areas to collect firewood for cooking ugali or stews. In the new, crowded villages, these resources were quickly exhausted. Women now had to walk much farther, spending hours each day just to gather the basic elements needed to cook a single meal. This extra labor took time away from farming and childcare, putting even more strain on family food security.
The Heavy Food Burden on Women
The policy placed a superhuman food burden on women. They were expected to:
1. Rebuild the Family Food Supply from Zero
They had to find new sources for everything: new fields to plant, new spots to find wild vegetables (mboga), new trees for fruits, and new clean water sources—all without the ancestral knowledge of the land. Every meal became a difficult challenge.
2. Face Hunger and Exhaustion
The physical labor of clearing new land was exhausting. With crops failing on unfamiliar soil, hunger was common. The mental strain of constantly worrying about how to feed the family, while also managing the loss of their old productive farms, was overwhelming.
How the Government Forced Change Through Food Control
The state used control over food and resources to force people to move:
· Withholding Services: The government linked access to things like milled maize or agricultural help to moving to villages. If you stayed on your family farm, you might be cut off from these resources.
· Blocking Food Markets: It became hard for people outside villages to get their harvest to market or buy supplies, making it nearly impossible to sustain an independent food economy.
· Direct Destruction: In the worst cases, soldiers would burn family granaries or rip up crops to starve people into compliance, a direct attack on a family's food survival.
 |
| A family in 1949 Tanzania. The hearth and home were the center of food tradition, which Ujamaa disrupted. |
The Legacy: Broken Food Traditions
Many families were moved with no warning and given no compensation for their lost farms, fruit trees, or stored harvests. This was a profound betrayal. Ujamaa's "familyhood" was undermined by creating hunger and breaking the sacred bond between a family, their land, and their food traditions. While the policy aimed for unity, it failed to respect the fact that African food culture is rooted in the diversity of local landscapes, family knowledge, and the daily rhythms of the kitchen garden. The story of Ujamaa is a stark lesson in how policies that ignore the central role of food, farming, and women's culinary labor can cause deep and lasting harm.
